Middle East Reviews

by LCDR Youssef H. Aboul-Enein, USN

ANATOMY OF THE 1952 EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION

This last July saw a host of articles, special editions and magazines commemorating the fiftieth anniversary that ended the monarchy in Egypt. Many of the articles address the historical perspective of the revolution including the anatomy of how the bloodless coup occurred on July 23rd, 1952 that ousted King Farouk I. No article deals specifically with how Egypt's experiment with Republican Government has evolved or devolved over the last half century. The Free Officers group that pulled off the coup included Nasser, Sadat, Naguib, Amer and many other names. They cannot really be classified as founding fathers of the same stature as Washington or Jefferson, but they did enter into the conspiracy to overthrow the monarchy with interesting ideas of reforming the government. They touted that their revolution is the first time Egypt was ruled by Egyptians since Ptolemic Dynasty of the Early Kingdom of the Pharaohs. However these Free Officers descended into an abyss of repression and dictatorship in the name of reform, internal security and regime preservation. This essay will look at the days before, during and after the 1952 revolution to assess the anatomy of the coup and the ideals they proposed to the Egyptian people in order to maintain hold on the government and depose the king. Arabic sources will be used to write this article as it offers their perspective on the revolution.

Organizing the Coup

It is important to realize that the seeds of the 1952 coup to topple King Farouk were sown On their return to Egypt after a negotiated settlement, the armed forces came home to find the king enriching himself and his entourage with arms sales prior and during the war. The king had speculated and received kickbacks on war materiel. A group of discontented officers would emerge calling themselves the Free Officers and would begin creating a secret revolutionary cell within the Egyptian army. This is not a new innovation, Hassan-al-Banna's Muslim Brotherhood had been doing the same thing beginning in World War II and intensified his efforts after the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. What the Free Officers did that was innovative, was recruiting specific units in and around Cairo from the infantry, artillery, signals and mechanized formations that would be key to pulling off a coup de'etat. There would be 266 officers who would be active members of the Free Officers movement.

The Decision on the Day

According to Egyptian sources the revolution was set for November and then was moved up to the fifth of August, to catch the king and his entourage at his summer retreat in Alexandria. The coup however was staged on July 23rd, because the Free Officer's senior leader General Muhammad Naguib was contacted by Interior Minister Muhammad Hashim, five days before. The interior minister had information on twelve officers and wanted to discuss their involvement in the Free Officers movement. The movement although secretive was not by any means completely clandestine, their pamphlets were found among the king's security services and were even shown to the king himself. Fearing a purge, ten of the Free Officers met at the apartment of Maj Khalid Moih-al-Deen on 22nd of July, they included Nasser, Air force officer Abd-al-Latif AlBughdadi, Kamal al-Din al-Hussein, Hassan Ibrahim and Abd-al-Hakim Amer. They outlined their plans and each was delegated a specific part of the plan with H-Hour being 0100 and D-Day on the next day 23rd of July.

The Plan

The plan for the coup was divided into three phases. Phase one, the Defense Ministry and broadcast tower would be taken over by the 13th Infantry Battalion whereby they would leave Abbasia Barracks and take over these sites and would be reinforced by the 1st Mechanized Infantry Battalion. Artillery units in charge of officers aligned to the movement would surround both Almaza and Abbasia Barracks, ensuring further divisions did not leave or of they attempted to depart would open-fire. They were equipped with 17-pound anti-tank artillery rounds. The Free Officers also set up checkpoints and defensive positions to the North and East of Cairo isolating both Almaza and Abbasia Barracks from Command Headquarters near Abdine Palace. The cavalry element of the 13th Infantry Battalion would complete the envelopment and defensive part of phase one by surrounding Egypt's border guard headquarters cutting off command and control of this armed organization from its leader General Hussein Sirri Amer, who was known to be an avid royalist.

Phase one also included a mission carried out by Signals Officer Anwar al-Sadat and his unit, this included taking over the telephone exchange. Controlling the exchange cut off any communications between Cairo and the king in Alexandria. Major Magdy Hassanien was given the responsibility of securing the radio communication center at Abu Zaabal. There was also a military command and control headquarters in Tahrir Square, but this was left alone, as General Haidar Pasha the Commander-in- Chief and his staff were all vacationing in Alexandria with the king. The key to the success was cutting off communications between decision-makers and military leaders. As no leader would make a move without authorization, their simple plan worked.

Phase two, included drawing up plans for a provisional revolutionary government that would have the confidence of the people and the army. It also outlined plans for mobilizing against civil authority and ministries so that there would be little interruption in the governance of Cairo and Egypt as a whole. Phase three, involved different scenarios for getting rid of the king if caught or if he escapes to an embassy of a third country.

Royalists Get Wind of the Coup

Egyptian accounts explain that General Ahmed Talat Commander-in-Chief of the Cairo Military District got wind of the activities of the Free Officers at 10:00pm on the 22nd of July. However he made several blunders, instead of reacting immediately he made efforts to contact the interior minister and get word to the summer palace in Alexandria. He also attempted to arrange a meeting at his office of all his staff officers, instead of sending them directly to their units. Talat assumed that the revolt would culminate at Abdine Palace in Cairo, with an ultimatum delivered to the king. These assumptions were based on the Urabi Revolt that occurred 70 years ago. The Free Officers also used this erroneous assumption that Abdine Palace would be the focal point of the revolution when they dispatched an officer with orders for Cairo's military police to depart from their barracks and head directly to Palace. This in light of the fact that the king was in Alexandria and that key military units, communications as well as command and control centers were the primary targets of the Free Officers.

Another key element of the Free Officers plan was sending a team of 60 troops to proceed to the homes of key senior officers in the king's armed forces starting at H- Hour 0100. Approximately 20 officers were caught and locked up in a jail at the Military Academy.

Conclusion

It would take four hours for the Free Officers to control Cairo. What is interesting is that the Egyptian military was only 30,000 troops in 1952 with 266 officers being sympathetic or active members of the revolutionary cell. About 80 participated in the July 23rd coup. The number of officers who are members of the Free Officer organization do not represent those members of the military and police who harbored revolutionary thoughts but were members of the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, King Farouk's army was riddled with officers and non-commissioned officers who despise the monarchy. Nasser would tap into the supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood using Sadat who had contacts with the organization. Until his death in 1949, the Islamist leader Hassan-al-Banna and his successor Omar al-Telmessany would encourage members of his organization to support the Free Officers movement in the name of ridding Egypt of British influence and asserting Egyptian nationalism. King Farouk would escape unharmed aboard his yacht Mahroussa for exile in Italy, his infant son Ahmed Fuad was named regent, however within a year Egypt was formally declared a Republic.

Why is reflecting on the anatomy of the Egyptian revolution important? We see traces of it creeping up in the writings of Bin Laden's ideologue, the Egyptian Ayman al- Zawahiri. In his 2002 book Knights Under the Banner of the Prophet he describes a failed coup attempt by jihadists in 1981 right after the assassination of Sadat. The coup involved mobilizing against broadcasting stations and also plans to recruit cells from within the Egyptian military. Additionally, the 1952 revolution was model for several military coups in the region like Syria and Iraq, although the Egyptian model was less violent. We can begin to understand the influence of a revolutionary group in the region by compre- hending elements and the history of successful coups.

Sources: (1) Egyptian Magazine Akher Saah, special edition on 50th anniversary of the Egyptian Revolution. Asrar al-Thawra, Yarweehah Naguib, Nasser wa al-Sadat (Secrets of the Revolution, as told by Naguib, Nasser and Sadat. 24 July 2002. Cairo, Egypt. (2) Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Knights Under the Prophet's Banner: Meditations on the Jihadist Movement. Published in Al-Sharq al-Awsat in January 2002.

__________________

THE PROTECTION OF MODERATE ISLAMIC THOUGHT

On May 3rd, Mr. Paul Wolfowitz gave a speech to the World Affairs Council in Monterey, California. The Deputy Secretary of Defense implored, "The west needs to understand that there are many different interpretations of Islam, and the secular authority and Islam can live peacefully together." He also said, "We must work to appeal to a broad population, as well as voices struggling to rise above the din of extremism, voices that tell us that the Islam of Muhammad is not the religion of Bin Laden and suicide bombers." His remarks have been an inspiration to me personally as his words ring true for every Muslim scholar who cannot debate his own religion or write publicly regarding ideas of Quranic interpretations without being a target of Islamic extremism. Operation Enduring Freedom not only protects our country but the concept of whether one form of Islam that of intolerance, bigotry and abject domination will succeed over a religion as diverse as the other monotheistic religions of the world.

When officials and scholars say that Islamic militants have hijacked a religion, let us be specific. What Al-Qaeda, Al-Jihad, and other militant organizations have done is to take elements of the Quran (Islamic Book of Divine Revelation) and only quote to the masses certain verses that justify their violent acts. For instance, the Quran indeed sanctions a violent form of Jihad against infidels, but what the Islamic terrorist and their ideologues to not say is that these versus were revealed when Prophet Muhammad was trying to establish an infant Islamic society amidst a program of genocide conducted by the Meccans who lived at the time and found his message of monotheism and social justice threatening. Listening to the words of Bin Laden and his reference to fighting crusaders have no basis in the original founding of Islam in the seventh century but is hateful language that found its way into Arabic vernacular during the crusades that began in the eleventh century.

Bin Laden and Islamic militants have neglected key verses of the Quran that adds credence to Mr. Wolfowitz's remarks. Sura 49, verse 13 of the Quran states, "O mankind we created you from a single (pair) of a male and female and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know each other (not that you should hate one another) verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you." This verse encourages Muslims to engage a variety of people and be inspired by the variety of thought, ideas, religions and viewpoints that God created. It is this verse that made the Arabs one of the most prolific traders and seafarers from the ninth to the fifteenth centuries. The suicide bombers who claim for themselves paradise did not think of Sura 5, verse 8, "O ye who believe! Stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from Justice. Be just, that (justice) is next to piety and fear Allah, for Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do."

How would the Palestinian issue be resolved had its people been steeped in a rational thinking of their religion. In Sura 60, verses 7 to 8 of the Quran, "It may be that Allah will establish friendship between you and those whom you hold as enemies. For Allah has power (over all things); and Allah is forgiving and most merciful." It is not the interest of those wanting to propagate violence to quote the many passages of the Quran that appeal to the message of brotherhood, forgiveness, charity and respecting the rights of all persons. Instead Islamic terror organizations bring out those elements of Islamic scripture that encourage violence and even them take it out of its historical context to further their cause.

When Mr. Wolfowitz says that Islam and democracy is compatible he is absolutely on the mark and there are Islamic clerical commentators that back his statement. One of the main pillars of Jihadist groups is the reestablishment of the Caliphate, which was abolished in 1926 with the collapse of the Ottoman Turks. The concept of the Caliphate is not one present in the Islam of Muhammad's time; the Prophet left no guidance about how his community should govern itself. What is clear however is that government is sanctioned by the Ummah (the community) and not by one person. This concept of self- government by the community represents some of the basic elements of modern democracy, which is not incompatible with Islamic thought. Islamic scholars have also correctly identified that the Caliphate is not one of the principles of Islam and therefore not the only form of governance for Muslims. Islamic militants want to forcibly graft their version of government, religion and tyranny on the community of Muslims; we have seen a glimpse of what could happen when diverse Muslims are subjected to one form of tyrannical Islam with the Taliban.

Through our efforts at thwarting terrorism, the United States can also ensure freedom to express and bring out a Muslim majority who will not stand for a single, intolerant and tyrannical form of their religion to the exclusion of all others. Mr. Wolfowitz said, "America and the west must encourage moderate Muslims who believe in a vision of Islam that embraces free thought, free speech and tolerance," to this statement I must respond with the traditional navy, "Aye! Aye! Sir!"

2004, Foreign Area Officer Association
Herndon, Virginia
Maintained by LTC Steve Gotowicki.
http://www.faoa.org